Freedom First
Freedom First

Home » Archive

Issue No.: 572 | February 2015
 

Budget 2015 – Will it Ensure Make in India?

M. R. Venkatesh
back
It is easy for the FM to say [as did the UPA] that the share of manufacturing in national GDP in 2025 would be in excess of 25 per cent. But as UPA realised it is easier said than done for what is required is a comprehensive plan with great attention to details and implementation. Crucially, he must revisit his targets once in three months and present a progress report to the nation.

Economics is a simple subject complicated by economists. Economics, as a reader would know involves production of goods and services for consumption. Nevertheless production must exceed consumption to allow savings. Savings must in turn convert into investments. Again investments must ensure production. 

This cycle needs to flow unhindered. And whenever the flow of goods and services [the aggregate of which is called GDP] gets derailed - and often it does we need intervention from Government. In turn, the Government has to get its policy mix correct at the right time. Going by historical evidence one must hasten to add that Government often does too little, too late. 

Theoretically, Government intervention is often through a range of economic policies - monetary and fiscal. This manifests through investment, interest, taxation, export, import and a range of other policies which are spelt out during the annual Budget of the Government. 

Notwithstanding this, the Indian economy faces shortage of goods and services in some sectors while facing a glut in others. There is excess capacity in some sectors and none in others. To add to the confusion we import some products at times which are already in excess supply and export those in short supply. 

The Union Budget is thus expected to recognise all these and address the entire range of economic distortions! And given the horrendous track record of the UPA Government let me hasten to add that the Finance Minister has a huge task of addressing the distortions that have crept in over the past decade.

Thus contrary to popular belief, a Budget of the Government is not merely a simple statement of its income and expenses. Rather it is much more. It is the pithy expression of its overall economic policies of course laced with the usual dose of politics.

A Blast from the Past

One of the major policy initiatives of the NDA Government since assuming office has been "Make in India.” At a philosophical level it is designed to facilitate investment, foster innovation and enhance skill development. While seeking to protect intellectual property it seeks to build best-in-class manufacturing infrastructure. Naturally it is expected the Budget will lay emphasis on this policy. 

It may be recalled that the share of manufacturing has been stagnating at approximately 16 per cent of our GDP since 1980s. Everyone within the Government is aware that inadequate infrastructure, complex regulatory environment and inadequate availability of skilled manpower have been its bugbear. Yet not much has been done. 

It is in this connection the National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council [NMCC] had come up with a "strategy” in February 2006 seeking to increase the share of manufacturing to a minimum of 25-35 percent of the GDP. That called for a growth rate of 14-16 per cent annually in the manufacturing sector alone.

"Though in the recent past, the growth of the manufacturing sector has generally outpaced the overall growth rate of the economy, at just over 16 percent of GDP, the contribution of the manufacturing sector in India is much below its potential.”

Now that was not the NMCC stating the obvious. Rather it was yet another report of the Government of India – this time in November 2011. 

"Inadequate growth in manufacturing has had its adverse impact on employment generation. The current mismatch between distribution of workforce and value added in agriculture is one of the main reasons for the large number of poor. This needs urgent correction.” 

No. This is not from the 2011 report of the Government of India. Rather it was the Foreword penned by the then Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh to the NMCC strategy document in 2006. "Over the next decade, India has to create gainful employment opportunities for a large section of its population, with varying degrees of skills and qualifications. This will entail creation of 220 million jobs by 2025 in order to reap the demographic dividend.” 

Now this is not Dr. Manmohan telling us in 2006. Rather this is from the 2011 Report of Government of India. In short, between 2006 and 2011 [in fact during the entire period of UPA] not much was done for manufacturing. Consequently, the share of manufacturing has stagnated at 16 percent of the GDP for the past several years. The world meanwhile, notably China, has whizzed past us. 

What Needs to be Done?

There are several challenges before Indian manufacturing that emerges on top of its global peer. And pundits both with the Government and outside have proffered plethora of solutions. But there is a crucial catch - have most of these pundits managed a factory for a day, much less, set it up? Is that why manufacturing has been languishing at 16 percent of the GDP? 

Whatever it may be, let us look into the net impact on the Indian economy. The net import of capital goods into the Indian economy between 2007-08 and 2013-14 was approximately USD 568 billion. Likewise the aggregate trade deficit [Exports less imports] was approximately USD 950 billion. 

What adds fat to the fire is that the imports from China alone during the corresponding period aggregates to USD 290 billion. It may be noted that we do not have a Free Trade Agreement with China. Yet, Chinese imports account for a significant portion of our imports.

But why? The answer for the same is not far to seek. Success of a nation in [manufacturing] globally is a culmination of several factors. It depends on skilled labour, low cost capital, access to technology, infrastructure, weak currency and of course the availability of raw materials. 

Now that China ends up with a trade surplus [Exports minus Imports] close to USD 300 billion [while our annual exports are approximately USD 300 billions] and has emerged as the world’s largest exporter it has begun to allow appreciation of its currency. Put pithily Chinese did not bother about how the world perceives it till it emerged as a global winner. Significantly, it charted a unique path for its economic success and pursued it with missionary zeal. 

The idea of 'Make in India' has not come a day too soon. However, concerns arise on account of several factors – notably power. And wherever power is available it is uncertain and of questionable quality. Power is indicative of all our infrastructure woes – port, railways, roads, airports, effluent treatment, pollution control et al are in shambles or simply non-existent. 

It is important to note that the best of companies in the organised sector end up paying 12 per cent interest on working capital when foreign companies pay far lower rates. Naturally, all this add to their competitiveness. Added to all this are our archaic labour laws, extortionist tax enactments and lethargic bureaucracy. Remember we are ranked 142nd in the ease of doing business. The net result is for all to see - Indian manufacturing is defeated not abroad but even within India. 

The problem for the Finance Minister is that if he raises the import duties or restricts imports of such products, prices shoot up. On the contrary if imports are allowed unrestricted, manufacturers in other countries on account of an overwhelming competitive advantage will never allow the Made in India initiative to succeed. 

Put pithily, the FM has a Hobson’s choice. To allow this initiative to succeed he has to bite the bullet and the nation has to pay a price for this initiative. Implicit in the argument is that the FM needs to prepare the nation for the long haul. 

For starters, he must spell out areas where India enjoys competitive advantage and can succeed. Similarly, he must lay out a road map with appropriate check points. 

It is easy for the FM to say [as did the UPA] that the share of manufacturing in national GDP in 2025 would be in excess of 25 per cent. But as UPA realised it is easier said than done for what is required is a comprehensive plan with great attention to details and implementation. Crucially, he must revisit his targets once in three months and present a progress report to the nation. 

The Billion Dollar question - Will Budget 2015 provide us the comprehensive plan to ensure Make in India initiative is a success?

M. R. VENKATESH is a Chennai-based Chartered Accountant. 
He can be contacted at mrv@mrv.net.in 
 www.mrv.net.in
 
back

Share

 
 
 

Archive

 
 

Other Articles in this Issue

Between Ourselves

GOPAL KRISHNA GOKHALE (1866 – 1915)

Editor
 

The Legacy of Gopal Krishna Gokhale

Introduction

A. B. Shah
 

Laying the Foundation for a Modern India

S. P. Aiyar
 

His Relevance Today

Aroon Tikekar
 

His Achievements

Sunil Gokhale
 

Gokhale And Gandhi – Their Second Meeting

Prabha Ravi Shankar
 

Sir Pherozeshah Mehta’s Tribute

Godrej N. Dotivala
 

Some Contemporaries of Gokhale in Poona

R. Srinivasan
 

The Symposium held on 15th November 2014 – Report

Chauhan, Devanshu, Khan, Jarupati and Sunilkumar
 

Great Indian Liberals: Rt.Hon.– Srinivasa Sastri

 

Prime Minister Modi and Governance

Will the Real BJP Please Stand Up?

Firoze Hirjikaka
 

Budget 2015 – Will it Ensure Make in India?

M. R. Venkatesh
 

Right-Wing Zealots Are Derailing Modi's Push for a Development Agenda

Bapu Satyanarayana
 

Foreign Relations in the 21st Century

Global Power Structure in Transition: A New Bipolar World Underway?

B. Ramesh Babu
 

Point - Counter Point : Every issue has at least two sides

The Jihadi Mind

Ashok Karnik
 

Unspeakable Cruelty

Ashok Karnik
 

Loose Cannons

Ashok Karnik
 

National Security Vs Politics

Ashok Karnik
 

Reflections

The Peshawar Attack on School Kids: Implications for NATO’s Strategy in South Asia

Ashish Punthambekar
 

Why No Department of History of Science?

 

What Kind of Religiosity is this?

Suresh Shirodkar.
 

One of India’s greatest ironies

 

Book Review

Being Muslim and Working for Peace

Raphael Susewind
 
 
The journal of the Indian Committee for Cultural Freedom
© Copyright Freedom First. All rights reserved.
Freedom First
3rd Floor, Army and Navy Building,
148, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Mumbai - 400001. INDIA
Tel: +91-22-2284 3416, 6639 6366
Email: freedomfirst1952@gmail.com
Home
Freedom First Archives
Quest Archives
Contact Us
About Us
About ICCF
About Freedom First
About Quest
Publications
Swatantra Party
Introduction
Swatantra Party Documents
Sitemap